A number of residents have asked our view of the planning application for the Old Market (see earlier post). I've copied our objections below.
In a nutshell we do not believe that a planning application should be decided on the need for a sustainable business plan, or indeed to pay off a reported debt of £900,000. The scheme should be decided on its planning merits (or not).
We strongly support the thriving arts centre there, and have for ten years now, but not at such a heavy price for one of the ward's most significant buildings.
We call on the building's Trustees to reconsider such a modern extension to the building, which will permanently scar it.
Letter to Planning
Dear Sir/Madam
BH2009/00414 and BH2009/00415, the Old Market, Hove
As the ward councillors for the area we would like to express our objections to the above planning applications.
We do not believe that the scheme is acceptable because:
- it represents a gross over development of an important historic building.;- it will destroy the appearance of the building, especially looking down from Western Road;
- it will dominate the surrounding conservation area, which is mainly made up or two or three storey houses;- the modern design is out of keeping to the rest of the building;
- it will create unacceptable overlooking of surrounding homes.
As the ward councillors we want to see the Old Market continue to thrive, however, we do not believe that this is the way to achieve that.
I would be grateful if you would take account of these views when considering the application.
Cllr Paul Elgood
Cllr David Watkins
Brunswick and Adelaide ward
Monday, March 16, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment